We get so many phone calls and e-mails about our annual LM 100 list. Some are good, some are bad and some are downright ugly. Seems there are some sharp opinions out there about the benchmarks that make a company a "good" company. We're not taking sides. Trust us, we know first hand that revenue is not the only indicator of a good company, and that plenty of giant companies aren't great, while plenty of smaller companies could use a boost.
But our list is popular. We get more positive comments than negative ones, which is a good message to us that the list needs to be here. But smaller companies, keep an eye on LM's pages: We've got lots of special articles planned just for you.
In the meantime, check out this year's list at www.landscapemanagement.net and let us know your side of the matter by posting a comment here on our blog.
--Stephanie Ricca
2 comments:
I think the LM100 list is a great thing to see. however, how is the information obtained? I work for a company that clearly would land somewhere around # 50, yet isnt even on the list?
curious?
I work for TruGreen, and I think the list is very interesting. It would be nice to have some interviews/articles with some of the presidents/CEO's/owners of some of these companies in the issue.
Post a Comment